By Narayan Prasad Mishra
Over the span of seven to eight decades of Nepal’s history, we have witnessed—and lived through—various systems of governance: the Rana regime, the monarchy, the partyless Panchayat system, multiparty system with constitutional monarchy and finally the multiparty republican system. While memories of more than four decades ago may have faded for many, the experiences of the past forty years remain vivid in people’s minds.
Different political parties, raising slogans of democracy and socialism, mobilized the masses by accusing earlier regimes of failing to serve the nation and its people. As a result, a multiparty republican system was established in the country. The stated objectives of this system were noble: national development, public welfare, equal rights, equality, justice, and a life of dignity and comfort for all citizens. These ideals were admirable, and the people believed in them.
However, instead of delivering true democracy and justice, these parties advanced a system dominated by party interests and political leaders. Nepotism, favoritism, and corruption spread widely. The nation and its people were exploited, while those in power enriched themselves, their families, their inner circles, and their loyalists. One after another, those who attained positions of power became immensely wealthy.
After enduring more than three decades of such bitter experiences, the people responded with what can only be described as a silent rebellion. In the recent general election, voters overwhelmingly rejected and sidelined most of the established political parties and their leaders. As an alternative, they brought the Rastriya Swatantra Party to power with a strong mandate. This moment stands out in Nepal’s history as a unique, historic, and even remarkable event—a political awakening that will be remembered for years to come.
Following this change, the newly formed government, under the leadership of Balen Shah, introduced a comprehensive list of 100 action plans for good governance and administrative reform, some of which were accompanied by implementation timelines. These plans include many essential measures aimed at steering the country away from political manipulation and instability toward a path of progress. One particularly commendable point emphasizes that those involved in governance, administration, education, and public service should remain free from political influence and dedicate themselves solely to national service. The proper implementation of these measures has raised hope that the country may finally move in the right direction.
At present, three major tasks stand before the government. First, addressing past incidents where suppression of public movements led to violence and loss of life—ensuring that those responsible are held accountable in accordance with investigative recommendations. Second, identifying and punishing those responsible for corruption and irregularities that have pushed the nation toward decline. And third, establishing good governance and effective administration to lead the country on the path of development.
It is true that any government indeed has the responsibility to maintain law and order and to act against forces that threaten stability. Therefore, accusations related to the suppression of protests and the use of force make it difficult to easily hold officials accountable, especially in a society like ours, where even corrupt leaders often have thousands, if not millions, of supporters and followers. Becoming entangled in such matters may consume valuable time and energy, reducing the government’s ability to focus on the second and third priorities.
For this reason, it would be more productive for the present government to prioritize fighting corruption and ensuring good governance, rather than becoming overly absorbed in the complexities of the first task.
Login to add a comment