By Our Reporter
The Bhotekoshi flood has delivered a heavy blow to tourism in four districts, with preliminary estimates putting the sector’s losses at Rs 52.13 billion. The figure is large, but the bigger concern is what happens next. If damaged hotels, trails, heritage sites and adventure tourism facilities remain closed for months, the loss will keep growing through lost jobs, cancelled trips and declining local business.
The flood damaged 207 hotels and restaurants along the Bhotekoshi and Trishuli corridors, with estimated damage of Rs 19.56 billion. Tourism vehicles, trekking trails, heritage sites, rafting and camping facilities were also affected. Hotels and restaurants alone are estimated to have lost Rs 14.60 billion in foreign tourist income.
These figures show that tourism has suffered at several levels. Physical assets have been damaged, but so have visitor confidence, local employment and the flow of money into communities. Langtang’s commercial activity has also taken a hit, while domestic tourism earnings have declined.
Yet the sector should not treat the flood only as a story of loss. Reconstruction can become an opportunity to build a safer and stronger tourism economy if the government and private sector avoid simply restoring everything to its pre-flood condition.
The first task is to identify what can be reopened quickly and what requires major reconstruction. Not every hotel, trail or tourism facility should be rebuilt in the same location. Geological and flood-risk assessments should guide reconstruction, particularly along riverbanks and unstable slopes. New hotels and tourism infrastructure should meet stronger standards for flood, landslide and earthquake risks.
The government also needs to help businesses survive the period between disaster and reopening. Many tourism operators will have little income while facing loan repayments, employee costs and reconstruction bills. Soft loans, interest support, tax relief and targeted grants could prevent viable businesses from collapsing before tourists return.
Restoring access is equally important. Roads and bridges are the tourism sector’s supply lines. The government should give priority to repairing key routes to Langtang, Rasuwa, Nuwakot, Dhading and other affected destinations. Trekking trails, suspension bridges and river crossings must also be rebuilt with future disasters in mind.
Tourism promotion should begin alongside reconstruction, not after it is complete. The message should be factual: some areas have suffered severe damage, but many destinations remain accessible and safe. Blanket assurances would be counterproductive. Visitors need reliable information about which routes, hotels and attractions are open.
This is where the Nepal Tourism Board and private sector can work together. A dedicated recovery campaign could promote destinations that are ready to receive visitors, while digital platforms provide real-time information on roads, accommodation and trail conditions.
The disaster also offers a chance to diversify tourism products. The Bhotekoshi and Trishuli corridors are known for rafting, trekking and adventure tourism, but communities can develop cultural tourism, village stays, food tourism, short hikes and nature-based activities that are less dependent on a single river corridor.
The government should also seek climate and disaster-recovery financing for tourism infrastructure. Nepal has a strong case for international support because disasters linked to changing weather patterns are increasingly affecting infrastructure and livelihoods. Tourism recovery should be included in wider reconstruction and climate-financing plans.
Most importantly, the Rs 52.13 billion estimate should not become another report that sits on a government shelf. It should form the basis of a funded recovery plan with clear deadlines, responsible agencies and regular public reporting.
The Bhotekoshi flood has damaged a major tourism corridor. It does not have to permanently damage Nepal’s tourism prospects.
If reconstruction is safer, access is restored quickly, businesses receive temporary support and the government communicates honestly with visitors, the affected areas can return stronger. The goal should not be to rebuild yesterday’s tourism infrastructure. It should be to build a tourism economy that can withstand tomorrow’s disaster.
Login to add a comment