The student agitation demanding the removal of the quota reserved for the freedom fighters in Bangladesh finally toppled the elected government led by Sheikh Hasina of the Awami League. When the agitators occupied the residence of prime minister Hasina, she fled to India. A caretaker government led by Muhammad Yunus has been constituted, even though, the turmoil has not been stopped. Agitators are violating law and order and attacking the minority community including the Hindu followers. Hindu temples have been destroyed, yet, the government is unable to bring the situation under control. Hasina accuses the US of ousting her from power for Saint Martin Island. She revealed, "I could have remained in power if I surrendered the sovereignty of Saint Martin Island". "The US aim was to assert control over the Bay of Bengal. I resigned to avoid further violence" "I urge Bangladeshi citizens not to fall prey to radical manipulation". Some political observers have also predicted about the American hands behind the regime change in Bangladesh. When the Muslim extremist student leaders in agitation demanded the formation of an interim government under the Nobel Prize winner, Yunus Mohammed, one could guess the Western hands on the regime change. As Hasina denied the American proposal for developing an airbase on an island in Bangladesh, the CIA became active in toppling the Hasina government. The American agenda is said to be splitting Bangladesh and Myanmar and introducing a Christian nation for developing an American airbase thereby prolonging the current turmoil and the present attack on the Hindu followers is under the American plan, it is said. Bangladesh is a strategically important country for the USA to counter the two emerging powers, China and India. The Hasina-led government, known to be close to India, has hurt the Americans. It is worrisome that the minority community in Bangladesh is being victimized. Moreover, an economically vibrant nation has been victimized by foreign powers, and more seriously, the country may fall into a civil war. The lesson for Nepal to avoid possible turmoil is to handle foreign policy wisely and become cautious about foreign investments in political parties and their leaders. Economic prosperity is the backbone of a nation, thus far, Nepal should focus on developing a self-reliant economy. Sadly, we cannot expect a visionary move from the present-day political leaders and the present political system. Presently, we are inside a dark tunnel without an outlet at the end, we must return to the point from where the journey started.